Status Page Software: The Best Status Page Tools and Hosted Status Page Services Compared
Hosted and open source status page tools compared on the thing that decides the bill: whether the tool actually monitors your services or only publishes what something else tells it. We build Uptimehub, and we have said plainly where the others beat us.
Checked from regions with auto-retry. No single-location false alarms.
All systems operational. Steady pulse across every region.
api.example.com returned no response from all 6 regions. Auto-retry confirmed the outage, then we alerted your team.
api.example.com is back up. The incident is logged to your status page history automatically.
90-day uptime · branded · your domain
Live demo · drive it, no signup needed
In short
Status page software gives your customers a public page showing whether your services are up, what is broken right now, and what happened before. The field splits into two groups that are easy to confuse. Statuspage, Instatus and Status.io are display products: they publish beautifully but do not check anything, so you still have to buy a monitor and wire it in. UptimeRobot, Better Stack, StatusCake, Hyperping and Uptimehub monitor and publish from the same system, so a confirmed outage flips the page on its own. If you have not already bought monitoring, the combined tools are cheaper and far less work; Uptimehub includes a branded status page on a custom domain in every plan from $9 a month rather than selling it as a separate line item.
Side by side
Status page tools compared
The column that matters most is the third one. A tool that does not monitor cannot know that you are down, so every green tick on that page depends on an integration somebody built and nobody has tested since. Verified dollar figures are in the pricing table below rather than here, because list prices move and a stale number is worse than none.
| Tool | Best for | Monitoring built in | Custom domain | Subscriber alerts | Pricing model | Free tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uptimehub | Teams that want the monitoring and the page on one bill | Yes, all check types | Yes, included | Email and webhook | Per monitor, from $9/mo | No, paid only |
| Statuspage (Atlassian) | Large companies with a formal incident process | No, display only | Yes, paid tiers | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook, RSS | Per page tier by subscriber count | Yes, 100 subscribers |
| Instatus | The best looking page at the lowest price | Light checks only | Yes | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook | Tiered by subscribers and monitors | Yes, 200 subscribers |
| Better Stack | On-call teams that run a formal rota | Yes | Yes | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook | Per responder seat, plus telemetry usage | Yes, 1 status page |
| UptimeRobot | Small sites that want something free today | Yes | Paid tiers | Email and subscriber updates | Tiered by monitor count, listed in EUR | Yes, 50 monitors |
| Hyperping | Monitoring, on-call and status pages at a flat rate | Yes | Yes, 1 on the entry tier | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook | Flat tiers with seat add-ons | Yes, 1 status page |
| StatusCake | Uptime plus page speed on a tight budget | Yes | Paid tiers | Email and subscriber updates | Tiered plans, listed in EUR | Yes, 10 monitors |
| Status.io | Multi-service infrastructure with granular components | No, display only | Yes | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook, RSS | Tiered plans | Trial |
| incident.io | Slack-native teams running frequent incidents | No, display only | Yes | Email, Slack, webhook | Per seat, incident management first | Trial |
| Site24x7 StatusIQ | Companies already inside the Zoho stack | Yes, via Site24x7 | Yes | Email, SMS, Slack, webhook, RSS | Bundled into Site24x7 credits | Trial |
| Cronitor | Cron and background jobs shown publicly | Yes | Yes | Email and webhook | Per monitor, plus per extra user | Yes, basic pages |
| Uptime Kuma | Self-hosters who want no vendor and no bill | Yes | Yes, you host it | Webhook and chat integrations | Free and open source, you host it | Free, self-hosted |
| Cachet | Developers who want a page they fully control | No, display only | Yes, you host it | Email and webhook | Free and open source, you host it | Free, self-hosted |
The real split
Display-only pages versus monitoring-backed pages
Almost every disappointing status page purchase comes from missing this distinction at the shortlist stage. Statuspage, Status.io, incident.io and Cachet are publishing platforms. They are very good at the human side of an incident: naming components, writing updates, notifying subscribers, keeping a history. They have no opinion at all about whether your API is currently returning 500s, because they never ask it.
That means a display-only page has three moving parts instead of one. Something has to run the checks. Something has to decide a failure is real rather than a blip. Something has to call the status page API and flip the component. Teams usually build that middle layer once, during onboarding, and then never look at it again. The failure mode is quiet and specific: the site goes down, your monitoring pages the on-call engineer correctly, and the status page sits there showing all systems operational while support tickets pile up.
Monitoring-backed tools collapse those three parts into one. When uptime checks confirm a failure from a second region, the component changes state without anyone logging in, and changes back on recovery. You still write the incident notes, because no tool can explain the cause for you, but the availability part of the page is never stale. That is the whole argument for buying them together, and it is why our branded status page is included in every plan rather than sold as a module.
There is one honest case for the display-only route. If you are a larger company that already runs a serious observability stack and needs audience-specific pages, subscriber segmentation and an incident workflow tied into your existing tooling, Statuspage does things no bundled page does. Buy it for the workflow, not for the uptime display, and accept the integration work as part of the price.
Tool by tool
Where each status page service actually wins
Statuspage (Atlassian)
The incumbent, and still the page most enterprise buyers picture when they hear the words. The incident workflow is genuinely mature: templates, subscriber segmentation, scheduled maintenance and audience-specific pages for named customers. Two things push teams off it. It does no monitoring at all, so someone has to build and maintain the integration that actually flips components, and the price ladder climbs fast once you need more than the Hobby tier or want private pages.
Uptimehub vs Statuspage (Atlassian)Instatus
If the page itself is the product decision, Instatus is the one to look at. The pages load fast, they look better out of the box than almost anything else here, and the entry tiers are cheap. It is a status page company rather than a monitoring company, so treat the checks as a convenience rather than as your alerting system.
Uptimehub vs InstatusBetter Stack
Monitoring, on-call and a polished status page in one place, which is a strong combination if you actually run a rota. The catch is the billing shape: uptime access is priced per responder, confirmed on their pricing page at $34 a month billed monthly or $29 billed yearly, so the bill tracks how many humans you add rather than how much you watch.
Uptimehub vs Better StackUptimeRobot
The most common free starting point, and the free tier is genuinely generous at 50 monitors. The status page is the part that feels thinnest: branding and custom domains sit behind paid tiers, and the page is clearly the secondary product rather than the main event.
Uptimehub vs UptimeRobotHyperping
Bundles monitoring, on-call and status pages at published flat rates, which makes it easy to forecast. We verified the entry tier at $29 a month for 50 monitors and one custom-domain status page, rising to $89 and $299 for the higher tiers. Worth a look if you want on-call scheduling included and do not mind seat add-ons.
StatusCake
Pairs uptime checks with page speed testing, which most pure uptime tools skip, and the status page comes with the paid plans. Prices are listed in euros, so budget accordingly if you are approving spend in dollars.
Uptimehub vs StatusCakeStatus.io
Built for infrastructure with a lot of moving parts: fine-grained components, containers and per-region breakdowns, plus a broad set of notification channels. Display only, so it needs a monitor feeding it.
incident.io
Really an incident management platform that happens to publish a status page. If your incident response already lives in Slack and you want the page to fall out of that workflow automatically, it fits well. It is priced and scoped well above a team that just wants customers to see green.
Site24x7 StatusIQ
The status page arm of Zoho's all-in-one monitoring suite. Sensible if you are already buying Site24x7, hard to justify as a standalone purchase given how much platform comes attached.
Uptimehub vs Site24x7 StatusIQCronitor
Comes at this from the scheduled-job side. Basic status pages are included even on the free tier, and if your public commitment is about batch jobs completing rather than a web page loading, that framing is unusually well suited.
Uptimehub vs CronitorUptime Kuma
Free, open source, and the status pages are decent. The honest catch is structural rather than about features: a self-hosted status page runs on infrastructure that can fail at the same moment as the thing it reports on, which is precisely when you need it. If you go this route, host it somewhere with no shared dependency on your production stack.
Uptimehub vs Uptime KumaCachet
An older open source status page with no monitoring of its own. You drive it through its API, which is fine if you already have monitoring and want total control over the page, and a lot of work if you do not.
What it costs
Status page pricing, checked on each vendor's own page
Every figure below was read on the vendor's own pricing page in July 2026. Where a vendor lists in euros we have kept euros rather than converting, and where we could not read a number reliably we say so instead of guessing.
| Tool | Published price | What that buys |
|---|---|---|
| Uptimehub | From $9/mo (Starter, 20 monitors) | Branded status page and custom domain included in every plan |
| Statuspage (Atlassian) | Public pages: Free $0, Hobby $29, Startup $99, Business $399, Enterprise $1,499/mo. Private pages $79 / $249 / $599 / $1,499/mo | No monitoring included at any tier |
| Hyperping | Free $0, Essentials $29, Pro $89, Business $299/mo. Billed yearly: $24 / $74 / $249 | Entry tier is 50 monitors and 1 custom-domain status page |
| Better Stack | $34/mo per responder billed monthly, $29/mo billed yearly | Free tier covers 10 monitors and 1 status page |
| UptimeRobot | Listed in EUR: Solo EUR9, Team EUR33, Enterprise EUR69/mo | Free tier is 50 monitors at 5 minute checks |
| StatusCake | Listed in EUR: Superior EUR16.66/mo annual, Business EUR58.33/mo annual | Free tier is 10 monitors at 5 minute checks |
| Cronitor | Business $2/mo per monitor, plus $5/mo per extra user | Free tier is 5 monitors, 1 user, basic status pages |
| Instatus | Tiers published on their site; we could not read the figures reliably, so we are not quoting one | Verified tier limits: free 200 subscribers, Pro 5,000, Business 25,000 |
| Uptime Kuma / Cachet | $0 licence | You pay in hosting and in the hours someone spends patching it |
Read down that table and the shape of the category is obvious. The page itself is close to free, and everything expensive sits around it: subscribers, private pages, seats and the monitoring that has to exist underneath. A team that buys Statuspage Startup at $99 and a separate monitoring plan is spending more than a team on a bundled plan, for a setup with one extra integration to maintain. Our full breakdown of what checks cost is in the uptime monitoring cost guide.
How to choose
What to compare before you commit
Does it monitor, or only display?
This is the first fork in the road and it decides your real bill. A display-only page needs a separate monitoring product plus an integration that keeps working, which is two vendors and one more thing to break. A combined tool flips components from its own confirmed checks with nothing in between.
Custom domain and branding
A page at status.yourdomain.com is one a worried customer will trust. A page on a vendor subdomain looks like a phishing risk at exactly the wrong moment. Check which tier unlocks the custom domain, because it is very often not the cheapest one.
How subscribers are counted and billed
Most status page pricing ladders are really subscriber ladders. Email subscribers are usually cheap, SMS almost never is, and a page that quietly caps you at a few hundred addresses will force an upgrade the first time you have a bad week.
Independence from your own infrastructure
The page has to survive the outage it describes. That rules out hosting it in the same cluster, behind the same load balancer, or on a domain whose DNS resolves through the stack that just failed. Hosted vendors get this right by default; self-hosted setups usually have to be argued into it.
Public versus private pages
If you sell to enterprises, at least one customer will ask for a page only their team can see, often with their own components and their own SLA numbers. Private and audience-specific pages are consistently the most expensive feature in this category, so price it before you promise it.
Incident workflow
Look for incident templates, severity levels, scheduled maintenance windows and a resolved-incident history. During a real outage nobody writes good prose, so pre-written templates and a forced update cadence do more for your reputation than any design feature.
Pricing model
Per subscriber, per seat and per monitor grow very differently. Per-seat pricing punishes bringing more of your team into the tool, which is the opposite of what you want during an incident. Per-monitor pricing only rises when you genuinely watch more things.
If you want the practical build order rather than the buying criteria, our guide to creating a status page walks through picking components, wiring the monitors and writing the first incident. For the wider monitoring shortlist that sits underneath all of this, see our uptime monitoring tools comparison, and if you are weighing running the whole thing yourself, the self-hosted versus hosted breakdown has the argument in full.
FAQ
Questions buyers ask when comparing status page software
It depends on whether you already pay for monitoring. If you do not, a combined tool is the better buy: Uptimehub, Better Stack, Hyperping and UptimeRobot all check your services and publish the page from the same data. If you already have monitoring and want the deepest incident workflow, Statuspage remains the most complete, and Instatus is the pick when the page needs to look excellent and cost very little.
A basic public status page runs from nothing to about $30 a month, and a page with a custom domain, several thousand subscribers and private-page support typically lands between $30 and $400 a month. Atlassian Statuspage is the ceiling in this category at $1,499 a month for Enterprise, with private pages priced separately from $79. Bundled status pages inside a monitoring plan are usually the cheapest route, because you are not paying twice.
No. Atlassian Statuspage publishes and communicates, but it does not check whether your services are up. You have to connect an external monitoring tool or push updates through its API, which means the page is only as current as the integration behind it. Tools that monitor and publish from one system update the page from their own confirmed checks instead.
A monitoring tool checks your services from outside and alerts your team privately when something breaks. A status page is the public side of the same event: it tells customers what is affected and when you expect it back. Monitoring answers do we know, and the status page answers do they know. Buying them together removes the integration that otherwise sits between the two.
It is worth it when control or compliance matters more than convenience, and it is a poor trade when it does not. Uptime Kuma and Cachet cost nothing to license, but you own the hosting, patching and the harder problem: keeping the page alive during the outage it exists to explain. Budget the engineer hours honestly and the free option is often not the cheap one.
A subdomain such as status.yourdomain.com is the right default because customers recognize it instantly, but only if its DNS and hosting are independent of your production stack. If the same nameservers or the same load balancer serve both, an infrastructure failure takes down your explanation along with your product. Hosted status page vendors resolve this for you.
Last updated July 2026
Get the monitoring and the status page on one bill
A branded status page on your own domain, powered automatically by checks from six global regions, included in every plan from $9 a month. Priced per monitor, never per seat, so your whole team and every client can log in at no extra cost.